Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote on 2/7/12 11:22 AM: > > The upshot is: > > - at some point we'll have to create the resolution. In every community I've > graduated > so far (Tika, Nutch, OODT, Gora), we threw the resolution up as part of the > VOTE > discussion so that folks knew exactly what they were VOTE'ing on. The end > product > of this community is to: > - present the resolution to the IPMC, ask them to agree with it > - have the IPMC present the resolution to the board and have them agree > with it > > If both of those steps happen, in that order, we'll have ourselves a new TLP. > If > they (or the preceding steps) don't happen in precisely the same order, or > precisely the same way, that's probably OK too, long as the end result is > the same. > > Net: check out the resolution I sent, make sure that: > - the description of Lucy buried in there (near "open source software for") > makes sense. > - we all agree on who the VP is -- who would like to be the VP? Marvin; or > you? Would > you guys like to hold a separate VOTE for that, or can you two come to > consensus > between the 2 of you on list? I personally would support either candidate. >
thanks, that is very helpful. -- Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . [email protected]
