On 25/03/2012 20:57, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 4:13 AM,<[email protected]> wrote:
Author: nwellnhof
Date: Sat Mar 24 11:13:46 2012
New Revision: 1304766
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1304766&view=rev
Log:
Always include ZombieCharBuf and VTable in parcel.c
Extensions need them
Sorry, that wasn't very clear.
If extensions need ZombieCharBuf and VTable header files, that's cool -- but
if they need the struct definitions, that's a bug.
+ "#define C_LUCY_ZOMBIECHARBUF\n"
+ "#define C_LUCY_VTABLE\n"
"%s\n"
"#include \"parcel.h\"\n"
+ "#include \"Lucy/Object/CharBuf.h\"\n"
+ "#include \"Lucy/Object/VTable.h\"\n"
It's not the extensions that need the struct definitions, it's the code
in parcel.c:
/* Define the variable which holds this class's class name.
*/
static cfish_ZombieCharBuf LUCY_QUERY_CLASS_NAME = {
CFISH_ZOMBIECHARBUF,
{1}, /* ref.count */
"Lucy::Search::Query",
19,
0
};
When building Lucy, CharBuf and VTable are automatically included with
struct definitions. But in extensions this is not the case.
Nick
