Hi, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Might you also be interested in starting off with a pure-Perl test case to > verify that the pluggable deletions apparatus works as it should? If so, I'll > try to write up the necessary docs.
Just to verify, that I don't get it wrong. This test case has nothing to do with the benchmark suite, does it? If it doesn't then why is it preferable to write it in Perl? Later on we'll have to port it to C anyway. I don't mind doing it in Perl though :-) I'll be glad to do it when you finish the docs. > FYI, I had intended to use Perl, because this is mostly a scripting task and I > wanted to get things done reasonably quickly. C would give us the advantage > of being able to test multiple bindings, but it's a lot of work up front. Yes, developing in Perl will be much faster than C. We still can port the benchmark test to C later on if there'll be an urgent need for this. Andreas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
