On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 11:49:51AM -0700, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > > It seems like using LUCY Jira might be more appropriate, since some of the > > tasks -- e.g. our mods to Lucy's Jira :) -- don't seem to require Infra > > involvement. > > Yep, but let's be specific. What do you think should be LUCY Jira issues > versus INFRA issues?
I care about getting the individual sub-issues right, and I care about updating the checklist at <http://incubator.apache.org/projects/lucy.html>. I don't have strong opinions about whether or where we perform additional omnibus tracking. If others do, though, I'm happy to dot a few extra i's and cross a few extra t's. > 1. mailing lists (creation of [email protected] lists and migration of > existing subscriptions to new lists). I'd imagine this also includes > decommissioning of the old Lucene M/Ls for Lucy as they shouldn't be needed > any longer and per the Incubator resolution for Lucy, the Lucene PMC is no > longer cognizant over. When Infra "migrates" mailing lists, it looks like they put forwards in place on the old lists. > 2. SVN (did Hoss take care of this already?) It's not done until we all have commit access and everything in the existing repository under lucene/lucy has moved over. IIUC, we're waiting for someone within the Incubator with sufficient karma to take certain actions. For now I'm relying on Hoss to keep that ball rolling. > 3. Wiki (needs to move to incubator space?) I don't think it will have to move, though we may need to insert the incubation disclaimer on the front page. My preference is that it stay where it is. I have to step out right now, but full rationale will follow in another mail. > 4. Lucy UNIX groups under Incubator karma, removal of Lucy Lucene karma > rules (I think Hoss took care of this already) I think orderly shutdown of the existing Lucy Lucene subproject website, svn, etc needs to wait until everything is set up under incubator. > > Having said that, where we file it is an implementation detail I don't have > > strong opinions about. Please go ahead and open a ticket wherever you see > > fit. > > So, to me it looks like we need INFRA help with #1 and maybe #3, right? If > so, I'll handle filing the issues. Maybe just #1, which I've already claimed -- let's not duplicate. :) Marvin Humphrey
