On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Marvin Humphrey <[email protected]> wrote: >> If so, feature request: my @field_hit = $hits->relevant_field() would >> be really nice ;)
> Peter has provided one vision, in SWISH::Prog::Lucy::Results. I confess that > I don't quite understand what you've shown us above. Can you provide some > context illustrating how it would be used? Sorry, is that last Q directed at me, or Peter? If me, then @field_hit would contain my list of 'field' names in which the search terms were found, allowing me to do my thang. > I assume that you have stripped all HTML tags from your data. (They would > likely mess up scoring if left in). Thus seeing if a highlighted exerpt > contains a "<strong>" tag suffices to indicate that a field indeed matched. Yes, it's clean text. Is it safe to change the schema so that my 'inbound_text' field is highlightable (currently OFF)? - ie, there will be a mixture of the 'inbound_text' field in various indexes (which will end up being merged to large searchable indexes) with/without highlightable being ON.
