Nikolay Kabaivanov wrote:
>
> Zdrawejte
> Upgrejdnah edna mashina pod RH 6.x do RH 7.0 i kogato reshih da
> kompiliram neshto mi dawa che ne moze da prawi exe-ta
> Niakakwi idei kakwo mi lipswa kato rpm paket ? Do predi upgrejda wsicko
> si beshe OK.
> -------------------------------------------
> [root@lotus /usr/local/src/mrtg-2.9.2]# ./configure
> creating cache ./config.cache
> checking for gcc... gcc
> checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no
> configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler
> cannot create executables.
> [root@lotus /usr/local/src/mrtg-2.9.2]# rpm -qa | grep gcc
> gcc-2.96-54
> gcc-c++-2.96-54
> kgcc-1.1.2-40
> -------------------------------------------------------
Na dosta mesta chetoh, che RH 7.0 e pooklepan. Mnogo hora
se oplakvaha imenno ot kompilatora. Zashto ne downgrade-nesh
na 2.95.* i da probvash pak?
I bez da minavash na 2.95 mozhesh da proverish kakvo stava.
Siguren sqm, che chastta ot ./configure , koyato proveryava
validnostta na gcc, se sqstoi v
sqzdava se vremenen .c file,
vqhru nego se puska gcc,
eventualno (ako gcc e chitav) se poluchava executable
./configure startira tova exe i sravnyava output-a s neshto
ako ne sqvpada, dava sqobshtenie za greshka.
Shto ne si go napravish tozi .c file i da vidish dali izobshto
gcc go kompilira, i t.n. ?
Na Slashdot otvoreno pismo ot Bob Young, shef na RH, v otgovor na
oplakvaniyata ot 7.0. Toy tvqreshe, bez da se argumentira,
che kritikite kqm gcc-2.96 bili neosnovatelni...
--
Minko
==================================================================
A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers)
Otpiswaneto RABOTI !!! : [EMAIL PROTECTED] UNSUBSCRIBE LUG-BG
http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora
