On Tuesday 13 November 2001 11:25, you wrote: > ot http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/kt20011029_139.html#1 > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL Edin moment sega, zna4i vyprosa mi e _STROGO_ tehni4eski, oba4e ne mozhah da namerq reshenie/obqsnenie sledvajki tozi link. Zna4i imam : kernel_image1 - kompiliran ot 2.4.10 source (unmodified) kernel_image2 - kompiliran ot 2.4.10 source patched s ext3 patcha. Kak se polu4ava taka 4e kernel_image1 load-va bez nikakvi grizhi kernel modula NVdriver, a kernel_image2 otkazva poradi licence pri4ini... Pak povtarqm imam syotvetno compiled NVdriver v : /lib/modules/2.4.10 /lib/modules/2.4.10patched
kernel_image2 otkaza da link-ne kojto i da e ot tqh s gorespomenatiq NOTE: ... Ta tehni4eski kak ediniq kernel_image spazva tezi licence preventions, a drugiq ne .. sled kato razlikata mezhdu tqh e edinstveno i samo ext3 patcha ??? Tova mi e vyprosa ... A ne dali na kernel developerite im haresva ili ne nqkoj da polzva tehnite interfejsi za da pravi binary only modules. Tova e druga tema koqto ne mislq da diskutiram ... Ako nesto ne sym razbral molq izvinete me, mozhe bi s dumi po-prosti ste shvana :) . 10x -- Greets, fr33zb1 =========================================================================== A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers) http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora
