On 24 10 2002 18:41, Огнян Кулев wrote: > George Danchev wrote: > > ne razbrah zasto e noviq compiler samo (gcc 3.2 ili ?) > > В тази нишката не забелязах да се споменава gcc 3.2, но glibc 2.3 се > компилира само с gcc 3.2 или по-нов[1]. > > [1] http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2002-08/msg00119.html
zna4i trebe se uto4nqwame togava ;-) ako distroto predlaga precompled glibc 2.3 packages, to gcc-3.2 ne e zadylzhitelno da go imame installed (mozhe i da e mozhe i da ne e, on user demand, pak on user demand mozhe da e mozhe i da ne e default compiler-a v systemata, tuka vnimatelno s c++ code-to, i az obi4am da imat nqkolko gcc versions ;-). libc6 2.3 _ne_ depends on gcc-3.2 , no libc6 2.3 build-depends on gcc-3.2 ... i gcc-3.2 _ne_ depends on libc6 2.3. za larry, v slu4aq ako squid se compile/link ve4e ok, to ne e kazano 4e ako imame glibc 2.3 x i compile somedanmcode.c linking s somedanmlib.a compeled against glibc 2.2.x ste e OK ... mozhe i da izreve pak ld zaradi tez danm symbols ne exported on glibc 2.3.x ;-) ok, mislq 4e e qsno ;-) -- Greets, fr33zb1 [catching up with Sid (the boy next door who destroyed toys :-)] [reg your bg translation or grab one from http://www.bgit.net/?id=37892] ============================================================================ A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers). http://www.linux-bulgaria.org - Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora To unsubscribe: http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/public/mail_list.html ============================================================================
