The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
I agree, you can't please everyone all the time :(. It's a shame that there isn't full focus on one distro but it is a necessary evil, by having many options, there will probably be one for everyone. In the long run, when everyone realises there is a distro that suits their needs, they will switch from windows. Joseph Mpora On 9/19/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. The List's Host is > not responsible for them in any way. > --------------------------------------- > > > > > why would it be that large? my apporach is getting all the minds > > behind Slackware, Gentoo, SuSE, FC, DamnSmall, Xandros, etc etc, to > > sit down and agree to perfect, say, Ubuntu as a desktop and Ubuntu as > > a server. This way, linux would surely beat windows in say, 100 yrs to > > come. Otherwise, it will never. > > rgds > > ernest > > There is a dilemma when it comes to priorities of what people want in an > OS. Some want good graphics mgt, others; light weight stuff, thin client > focus, desktop publishing, easy install, resource conservative, GUI > (Graphical Interface) only approach, CLI (command line) emphasis etc. > Surely even Windows u cant tell me that its good at all that. SO in order > to appeal to the various needs, I believe it is ok to have variants that > attract followings. > > Wire > > _______________________________________________ > LUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > -- _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
