EACOSS appreciates the commercial break R
On Wed, May 10, 2006 1:07 pm, Ronny said: > True ,no objection to that Mr Badru.But when it comes to some services > like Mail,DNS may be web too it's not all about money I think it's > management to some extent (my opinion) . > My point wasn't about money though it rates high, it was more of who > should access what.Talked of education, do the authorities in > Shangai have a point when they say "one should have > education/lincense" to takecare of a service like mail.I mean people > shouldn't think that having a mailserver is like having a cell > phone. I think this is the backwardness we still have.And it's good > EACOSS is there for Ugandans to start with and it's really doing good > for our nation.(commercial breake) :-) > Otherwise why shouldn't anyone with money have a mailserver if at all > he can employ someone with the experience in the field. > I wouldn't like to be ranked as Nigeria when it comes to scam just > because of high education.Sometimes too much of anything is bad. > Look at Wire's scenario,who was wrong?Everything should have a limit and > control, like it or not that's why we all exist.And I think Wire and all > of us on the list have some work to do but with limits. > Thanks for that point Mr Badru. > " Keep him in the dark and he will keep his money in the dark" :-) niceone > R. > > > *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*- > PGP Fingerprint: 6695 794A B84E D922 88FB 73CC 6CBD 8036 B3CD 7304 > If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. > --Isaac Newton > -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* > > > > > > Badru Ntege wrote: >> Ronny >> >> we are trying to move forward not backwards. Educate the user and you >> will make more money. Keep him in the dark and he will keep his money >> in the dark. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> *On Behalf Of *Ronny >> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2006 11:51 AM >> *To:* Linux Users Group Uganda >> *Subject:* Re: [LUG] Postfix error >> >> Congs friend. This happens the world over "it's our server so why >> not give us access "so say most customers.Don't worry there is a >> law in China that says nobody apart from a licensed party like you >> or an ISP should run a mailserver.This will save us time and give >> you/us more biz :-) when it get's in Ug >> Cheers >> R >> >> >> *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*- >> PGP Fingerprint: 6695 794A B84E D922 88FB 73CC 6CBD 8036 B3CD 7304 >> If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. >> --Isaac Newton >> >> -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Ronny >>> >>> After 5 hours of hassling with the issue, I decided to do a postfix >>> re-install and this sorted out issues. I therefore still strongly >>> believe >>> that the client could have tampered with the Antispam settings >>> since after >>> the clean install and reintegrating the original A/Spam, I got the >>> same >>> error as before. This morning I had the A/spam reinstalled and all >>> is back >>> on form. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Wire J >>> >>> >>>> Hi , since you made no changes to postfix,(assumming you don't >>>> have >>>> autoupdates) you may need to use the elimination method.If am >>>> right you >>>> have, an antivirus,antispam and the OS (all these do handsfree >>>> updates) >>>> right? >>>> Otherwise you may need to update the Postfix incase you have a >>>> lower >>>> version since we don't know which version you are currently >>>> running. >>>> Else other members may have some interesting pointers apart from >>>> mine >>>> (Eliminate to get the culprit).Worst scenario backup those conf >>>> files >>>> and reinstall the MTA takes less than 20 minutes ;-) >>>> R. >>>> >>>> >>>> *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*- >>>> PGP Fingerprint: 6695 794A B84E D922 88FB 73CC 6CBD 8036 B3CD 7304 >>>> If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of >>>> giants. >>>> --Isaac Newton >>>> >>>> -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Guido Sohne wrote: >>>> >>>>> On May 9, 2006, at 5:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> May 9 20:10:24 mail postfix/smtp[6162]: > 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]: >>>>>> . >>>>>> May 9 20:10:24 mail postfix/smtp[6162]: > 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]: >>>>>> QUIT >>>>>> May 9 20:10:26 mail filter-module[4254]: AAP304460CD00109E: >>>>>> spam_status=no >>>>>> ([EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]) >>>>>> May 9 20:10:26 mail postfix/smtp[6162]: < 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]: >>>>>> 451 >>>>>> 4.0.0 >>>>>> Local error (network error: Bad file descriptor) >>>>>> >>>>> At the line above, I think it says that your filter program is >>>>> telling >>>>> postfix that it encountered a 451 error ... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> May 9 20:10:26 mail postfix/smtp[6162]: connect to subsystem >>>>>> private/defer >>>>>> May 9 20:10:26 mail postfix/smtp[6162]: send attr nrequest = 0 >>>>>> May 9 20:10:26 mail postfix/smtp[6162]: send attr flags = 0 >>>>>> May 9 20:10:26 mail postfix/smtp[6162]: send attr queue_id = >>>>>> 30C7784613 >>>>>> May 9 20:10:26 mail postfix/smtp[6162]: send attr >>>>>> original_recipient = >>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> May 9 20:10:26 mail postfix/smtp[6162]: send attr recipient = >>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> May 9 20:10:26 mail postfix/smtp[6162]: send attr offset = 338 >>>>>> May 9 20:10:26 mail postfix/smtp[6162]: send attr status = 4.0.0 >>>>>> May 9 20:10:26 mail postfix/smtp[6162]: send attr action = >>>>>> delayed >>>>>> May 9 20:10:26 mail postfix/smtp[6162]: send attr reason = host >>>>>> 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.0.0 Local error (network error: >>>>>> Bad >>>>>> file >>>>>> descriptor) (in reply to end of DATA command) >>>>>> >>>>> Postfix appears to be passing that error condition back up, but >>>>> it >>>>> doesn't look like it originated from within Postfix, hence the < >>>>> character in the first occurrence of the error. >>>>> >>>>> -- G. >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> LUG mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >>>>> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ >>>>> >>>>> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them >>>>> (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not >>>>> responsible for >>>>> them in any way. >>>>> --------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> LUG mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >>>> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ >>>> >>>> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them >>>> (including >>>> attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them >>>> in any >>>> way. >>>> --------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> LUG mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >>> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ >>> >>> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them >>> (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible >>> for them in any way. >>> --------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LUG mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ >> >> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including >> attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any >> way. >> --------------------------------------- >> >> > _______________________________________________ > LUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including > attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any > way. > --------------------------------------- > > For EACOSS Robert K Lutaaya +25675-2808889 +25641-223802 _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
