Does this suggest then that Linus is okay about MS joining the the bandwagon for as long as they kept whatever code they shared open source? I can see chunks of MS code floating around in the next SuSe Distro If such is the card Linus is playing for with his "Open is not Free talk", It could well be a very smart move indeed.
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 09:19 +0300, Noah K Sematimba wrote: > On Monday 27 November 2006 16:56, HenRi wrote: > > At first the announcement that the chaps at SUSE were schmoozing with > > M$soft sounded like a good thing for Linux > > at least it sounded so on this forum > > Mr Shuttleworth(Ubuntu) obviously feels otherwise > > > > http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061125-8286.html > > > > so what dya think > > On the other hand, for all those who kept talking about GPLv3 and how it > would > sink the whole Microsoft /SuSE deal once the kernel was relicensed using it, > there will be some disappointment. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/25/161 > > > --- > "What you don't recognize, you do not celebrate. > What you do not celebrate, you do not reward. > What you do not reward exits your life." > > The Law of Recognition- Mike Murdock > _______________________________________________ > LUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including > attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. > --------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
