Joseph I was actually suggesting it as presented in a sytem like Fedora. It's just an MUA. So U need an MTA at the back. If U've installed Fedora from Core 4, for example, it comes with all the necessary binaries to allow U to click and allow the system to set itself up leaving U in peace. (I luv that part). When U choose the squirrelmail package at install time it takes care of all the dependencies (all). All U have to do is configure (sorry input) your organization specific details like org. name logo and issues like smtp server ain't that easy. If U like it easy like me there is google and howtoforge.com where U can get all sorts of very specific howtos on different setups. This gives U more time to enjoy the system and allow it to work, rather than telling U'r bosses about this interesting world of open (accountants read free) source and then spend another 2-4 weeks configuring a mail server, yet some other joes have suffered and offered U a chance to skip that step and use that time to develop better systems. Aint that cool. If U'r requirements still don't favour this, there is always the option of Kerio mail and the other boxed open source solutions. I'm using kerio mail, the cost may seem abit steep for most. However for USD 3000 you get, 3 installers (kerio installer, active directory integrator, outlook connector) 140 user licenses, 1 years support, a cool interface and install time of 30 minutes flat. Imagine that U can have a mail system runing on Linux with mailing lists, filters, spam control, antivirus and the like, that directly interfaces with the current Windows PDC and allows outlookers to connect directly (http /https imap/pop3) to the server and access there mails. Windows users can be created with a mailbox (user) at the PDC which saves on Admin work, and works with no tweaking. And before some one trys to mention free beer, remember that there are a good number of internal mail hosting companies in right here in Ug that swear by Kerio mail. :) Ain't that something. Pl'se choose a system that clearly provides for all your current requirements, so that U don't have to waste time in the future on dependencies and installing other packages to make this system meet U'r original requirements. Whatever you opt for I don't think U have the time for proof of concept expoilts. Most orgs prefer reliabilty to eye-candy or very special functionalities beyond their basic requiremnets.

FRANCIS. PS: Open source users (implementors) have to start implementing solutions not packages, that work the first time round, not systems that have to be tweeked daily. ======================================================= joseph mpora writes:
Francis,
From my understanding squirelmail (sp?) just gives you a webmail
interface to your qmail/sendmail/postfix system.
I appreciate the ability to have several different apps that work
together to give the user/admin the full functionality required.
However, am getting a little tired of learning several different apps
to achieve something. Joseph
On 6/29/07, Francis Musinguzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joseph,

Considering your needs; which are quite basic, at best. Using a simple
system like squirrel mail, would allow U the benefit of reduced (eliminated) down time while providing all the stated requirements. For the outlookers,
the option of the squiremail outlook theme, would allow U to think of
esthetics and functionality. This system is a simple rpm found on most of
the popular distros that works out of the box, for most requirements. There
are other systems as mentioned before but for most users who may never
notice or bother with all the extra features scalability of squirrel mail is a great plus. U didn't mention the modalities of your organization. In as much as squirrel
mail is able to comfortably support 100 + users, things like AMCs and
support for anticipated risk may matter more than reduced or no initial
cost. Here comes Kerio mail and the like.
Both systems are open source but the organizational requirements should
guide you in taking this decision. Simplicity is a must. U don't seem to
require too much so don't both yourself with systems that seem to offer so many things, as users may never appreciate or bother with them. Downtime, support, maintenance, setup time, and other initial requirements (time) should help you choose what will cover all your needs and some. Good luck in going open source, it's quite an experience. FRANCIS.

PS: When it comes to the actual world, what seemed like an advantage of open
source, the variety, becomes a liabilty. The time to choose the best tool
for your needs becomes a laborious task. This may seem surprising but a
study showed that too many choices usually make the process of choosing much harder, for most people.

====================================================== &David Ziggy Lubowa writes:

Am leaning towards zimbra, it seems the more activity and attention an
app gets, the faster bugs are fixed and the better the support.
++ Not to be biased considering this is a linux mailing list,  BUT if you
dealing with "outlook" users on your network the best solution "Without" a
doubt is exchange,  you can hack the linux mail servers as much as you
wish, but a combination of Exchange server and Microsoft Small business
server is the winner.   You can look at all the other alternatives zimbra
inclusive but your turn around time can not beat a person who will setup
exchange/SBS with groupware which is now the main thing in mail setups.

oh and i stand to be corrected on this :).
On 6/28/07, Reinier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,

I have always been quite impressed with egroupware (www.egroupware.org).
Another alternative is horde (www.horde.org) Both are mysql/php based
and
there are even packages of them for some distros.

I am pretty sure, some people will recommend zimbra, (www.zimbra.com) as
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to