Well, as long as it doesnt go through the sea or the middle east or a combination, that's ok.
5 broken cables in 2 weeks. The sea is not the way to go. I'd say we go right through Egypt, Gaza Strip, Israel, Lebanon, around the black sea, Moskow, Europe left & Asia Right. Forget about the States. On Thursday 07 February 2008 18:58:53 McTim wrote: > On Feb 7, 2008 6:04 PM, Mark Tinka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 05 February 2008, Ernest - (AfriNIC) wrote: > > > > > and the conflict in kenya would have undone all that work > > > by now. > > > > A point to be very mindful of since the cable landing > > station would be found east toward the neighbors. > > IIUC, the EA backhaul is supposed to go via Rwanda, and TZ as well. > > It would be much simpler to make a deal with the Sudanese to take from > Port Sudan, but since there is no multinational effort working on it, > no capital, etc, then it seems unlikely to happen. > > > > -- > Cheers, > > McTim > $ whois -h whois.afrinic.net mctim > _______________________________________________ > LUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. > --------------------------------------- > > -- rgds, Reinier Battenberg Director Mountbatten Ltd. +256 782 801 749 www.mountbatten.net _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
