Hi, On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 4:09 PM, McTim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well if the idea is to deny axfr, then .ug needs to close this "loophole". > I would agree with McTim. If any one out there can do an axfr for .ug from any of its primary and secondary name servers, then there is a loop hole that should be covered. Reiner, the result you got with the .tz and .rw, in my opinion are correct. No other name server, apart from those explicitly permitted to transfer records should be able to do so. If you are able to axfr records for the .ug and you are *NOT* sitted on the name servers that are an authority for it, then something is wrong. Correct me if i am wrong. -- Mike Of course, you might discount this possibility, but remember that one in a million chances happen 99% of the time. ------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
