My guess is it would either not see the disks at all or just see the first
36.4GB of space

On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 7:36 PM, Daniel Bwente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi Guys
>
> Am looking to upgrade a Sun Enterprise 450 server's Hard disks, Product
> documentation gives 36.4GB as the biggest hard disks it can take, what are
> the possible ramifications of putting in disks bigger than 36.4GB?
> --
>  Dan
>
> "You won't have eyes tonight. You won't have ears or a tongue. you will
> wander the underworld blind, deaf and dumb and all the dead will know; This
> is Hector: the fool who thought he killed Achilles."
>
> _______________________________________________
> LUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
>
> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
> attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
> ---------------------------------------
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to