On Wednesday 22 July 2009 05:28:38 pm Bernard Wanyama wrote: > The connection will be faster than what we are seeing > currently over satellite, maybe more than 3x if 600ms > divide by 3 gives 200ms!.
I don't think there's any dispute about the aesthetic feedback of 200ms vs. 650ms, as seen by an application. The issue here is the raw latency offered by the cable system. Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
