Niles,

Do not underestimate the strategy for MSFT. 

Remember MSFT sold one of the earlier versions of UNIX, Xenix or something
like that which they left to SCO (I think it became System III or IV) and
SUN (became Solaris). 

The reality is that the better Linux runs under Windows, the greater the
chance that it will be virtualized, and Windows services will be used. Have
u looked at Windows Server administration tools? Active Directory? They may
not be the most stable, but they are "EASY" to use

Stephen 

PS: This is not a Windows vs Linux debate

-----Original Message-----
From: Niles Collins [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 1:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [LUG] It is starting to get cold in hell.

Their logic is still a little backward. Why would you want to run the OS
with low overhead on top of the OS with the larger overhead. It should be
the other way around. The decision to use the GPL is what I am surprised
about. I feel that the time MS has spent to get their own OSS licenses
approved meant that they are completely against the GPL and what it stands
for.

On Wednesday, July 22, 2009, Paul Bagyenda <[email protected]> wrote:
> Indeed.
> On Jul 22, 2009, at 11:56, Simon Vass wrote:
>
>
> Sorry shouldn't that be beware geeks bearing gifts?!  Thank you Thank you
I'll be here all week.
>
> Simon Vass
> Technical Manager
> E-Tech Uganda Ltd
> http://www.etech.ug
> Tel: +256 (0) 312260620 or (0) 312260621
> Email: [email protected]
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Bagyenda" <[email protected]>
> To: "Linux Users Group Uganda" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 July, 2009 08:35:50 GMT +03:00 Iraq
> Subject: Re: [LUG] It is starting to get cold in hell.
>
>
> Beware Greeks bearing gifts.
>
>
> Still, why does anyone run Linux on top of Windows?!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 22, 2009, at 06:35, Niles Collins wrote:
>
>
>
>
> They could theoretically take over the entire OS by contributing the most
code. Lord knows they have enough money to throw some talented programmers
on the case.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jul 21, 2009, at 10:51 PM, Wire James < [email protected] >
wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Very good news. I like their change of heart and strategy. It shows that
they did not achieve market dominance by mistake. They are a malleable
company.
>
> Wire
>
>
> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 10:07 -0400, Niles Collins wrote:
>
>
> http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/07/microsoft-aims-at-vm-mar
> ket-with-linux-kernel-code-offering.ars
>
>
>
> Microsoft is contributing approximately 20,000 lines of source code to the
Linux kernel with the aim of improving support for running the Linux
operating system in virtualized environments on Windows servers. The move is
part of a broader trend at Microsoft towards collaboration with the open
source software community.
>
> Prominent Linux kernel developer Greg Kroah-Hartman announced the code
submission today in a message posted to the Linux kernel mailing list. He
says that the new drivers contributed by Microsoft will soon land in the
staging tree where they will undergo some refinement before they are merged
directly into the mainline kernel. Microsoft is making the code available
under the terms of GNU's General Public License (GPL), the open source
software license that is used by the Linux kernel.
>
>
> _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list 
> [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously 
> hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and 
> data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). 
> The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. 
> ---------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
>
> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
> ---------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> LUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
>
> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
> ---------------------------------------
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
>
> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
> ---------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> LUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://kym.net/mailman/ <http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug>
> _______________________________________________
> LUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
>
> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
> ---------------------------------------
>
>
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to