On Saturday 10 April 2010 06:01:40 pm joachim Gwoke wrote:

> For asking's sake,
> what do you make of this story I got from somebody?
>  http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/10/bgp_glitch/.
>  This raises lots of 'what ifs'...

As McTim has mentioned, this has happened a fair bit in 
recent years. Common cases are cited in the Renesys blog 
(remember YouTube's fiasco in Pakistan?).

We were affected by one in Brazil two years ago. Tools like 
BGPmon and others have helped narrow down offending networks 
much more quickly than in the past. Being on mailing lists 
where a lot of network operators lurk doesn't hurt either.

That said, BGP could use a face-lift in this regard, which 
is where RPKI comes in. But until then, a lot more vigilant 
filtering between service providers and their customers is 
what will save us. Unfortunately, this is not happening as 
much as we'd like.

>  for example can we tell
>  if huawei is not going to route us through china since
>  they are the ones laying the infamous data backbones?

This is unrelated, please don't spread FUD :-).

The network being built in Uganda is a Layer 1 piece of 
infrastructure, i.e., no IP routing is involved. Traffic is 
carried over DWDM (Dense Wave Division Multiplexing), which 
lives at Layer 1.

If the Ugandan network did connect to the Internet, similar 
risks as other IP networks in the world apply. I like a 
conspiracy theory as much as the next guy, but I don't think 
Huawei will be fitting backdoor chips into their equipment 
so they can help spread the Great Firewall :-). On the other 
hand, my confidence-level in their "packet" kit is wanting, 
to say the least, but that's another story.

>  Or
>  What else is going on out there that appears or we miss
>  as blips?

Lots. It's amazing the Internet even works at all :-).

To see more comments on this particular case, here's a 
thread on the NANOG mailing list:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg22006.html

Cheers,

Mark.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug

LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to