Please don't reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the
following link:
https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11519
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|S3 (normal) |S1 (critical)
(In reply to comment #1)
> Alex, Girish, here is an lfsck reported issue. Can Alex take an initial look
> and
> determine a course of action? If this is related to the other e2fsprogs work
> that Girish has been assigned, then it should rolled into the same planning
effort.
(In reply to comment #1)
> Alex, Girish, here is an lfsck reported issue. Can Alex take an initial look
> and
> determine a course of action? If this is related to the other e2fsprogs work
> that Girish has been assigned, then it should rolled into the same planning
effort.
We have experienced another problem on this fs, details in bug 11520, which is
preventing us from using the fs at all. We're advised by Peggy G at cray that
completing the orphan cleanup may help with that problem, so I've been told to
raise the severity of this problem too.
_______________________________________________
Lustre-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-devel
