Please don't reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the
following link:
https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10903
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO| |718
nThis| |
Severity|S3 (normal) |S2 (major)
I believe we have hit this same bug testing our ~month old 1.4.9pre snapshot
from b1_4_sles10.
I'm bumping up the severity as this will block 1.4.9 for us.
Jan 14 10:55:21 nid00132 kernel: LustreError:
13024:0:(osc_request.c:935:osc_brw_prep_request()) ASSERTION(pg->count > 0)
failed
Jan 14 10:55:21 nid00132 kernel: LustreError:
13024:0:(tracefile.c:443:libcfs_assertion_failed()) LBUG
Jan 14 10:55:21 nid00132 kernel: Lustre:
13024:0:(linux-debug.c:156:libcfs_debug_dumpstack()) showing stack for process
13024
Jan 14 10:55:21 nid00132 kernel: diotest4 R running task 0 13024
12949 (NOTLB)
Jan 14 10:55:21 nid00132 kernel: 0000000000000103 00000000099ace9c
ffff81000fae9100 ffff81000fae9100
Jan 14 10:55:21 nid00132 kernel: 00000000000002ae ffff81000fae9100
0000000045aa6079 ffff81006c726aa0
Jan 14 10:55:21 nid00132 kernel: 000000000050c001 ffff8100027a0968
Jan 14 10:55:21 nid00132 kernel: Call Trace: <ffffffff8016ccc6>{follow_page+534}
<ffffffff8016d067>{get_user_pages+775}
Jan 14 10:55:21 nid00132 kernel:
<ffffffff88315a3a>{:lov:lov_stripe_size+698}
<ffffffff8839d1e3>{:llite:ll_direct_IO_26+1187}
Jan 14 10:55:21 nid00132 kernel:
<ffffffff8836eb04>{:llite:ll_file_read+2052} <ffffffff80182287>{vfs_read+183}
Jan 14 10:55:21 nid00132 kernel: <ffffffff80182600>{sys_read+80}
<ffffffff8010bd4a>{system_call+126}
Jan 14 10:55:21 nid00132 kernel: LustreError: dumping log to
/tmp/lustre-log.1168793721.13024
It does not appear the lustre-log is available.
_______________________________________________
Lustre-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-devel
