Hi Ricardo, On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:48:38AM +0000, Ricardo Correia wrote:
> Here are some current ZFS/DMU benchmark results that might be of > interest to you. It's nice to see these results - thanks for posting them. When you have time, could you do a comparison with Lustre 1.6.x on ldiskfs + software RAID 5? It would be good to know how ZFS stands up (probably quite favourably, even at this early stage.) Cheers, Jody > These results were obtained on a Sunfire x4500 with these specifications: > > - 2 dual-core AMD Opteron processors > - 16 GB main memory > - 48 SATA II HDD (7200 RPM, 500 GB each) > - Solaris 10 update 3 > - Userspace DMU from OpenSolaris build 74 > > The tool used in this particular benchmark was PIOS, which simulates a > parallel I/O load typically experienced by an OSS. Since PIOS links > directly with the DMU, it should give a good estimation of the maximum > throughput of the userspace DMU-OSS. For comparison, you can also see > the results of running the same PIOS benchmark with normal POSIX I/O on > the Solaris 10u3 ZFS implementation. > > See the attached PDF for the results. > > First page provides PIOS throughput information on striped pools with > 10, 24 and 46 disks. uDMU outperforms kernel ZFS with 10 disks, however, > the kernel ZFS implementation scales better to 24 and 46 disks. > Surprisingly enough, disabling checksums has a negative impact on the > throughput with a 10-disk striped pool. This impact can be attributed to > the differences in the uDMU IO pipeline which are probably causing the > IOs to not being parallelized when checksumming is disabled. This issue, > however, should not be hard to fix. > > Second page shows the results of running PIOS on RAID-Z, RAID-Z2 and > mirrored pools. In these configurations, the kernel ZFS currently has a > better throughput than the userspace DMU. > > These results were obtained with only minimal tuning of the DMU (setting > a maximum cache size and increasing the number of I/O threads). Work is > already underway to improve the performance of the DMU and we expect to > see better throughput in the coming months. > > Best regards, > Ricardo > > -- > <http://www.sun.com> * Ricardo Manuel Correia * > > Lustre Engineering Group > *Sun Microsystems, Inc.* > Portugal > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss -- _______________________________________________ Lustre-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-devel
