On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 09:50 -0800, Nathan Rutman wrote: > well, that's why I asked. As I said, Andreas and I are in agreement, > and it certainly makes sense from a portability point of view, as well > as consistency with future features (snapshots, audit logs, etc.), and > the final elimination of our various /proc locking headaches. But yes, > it would break user's scripts - that's a 1-time thing, and I think not > too terrible.
Is it possible to support both for a release or two to give people time to migrate and have an actual implementation to test against as they work to port their scripts? The alternative is that given that we don't provide public beta binaries or nightly snapshot binaries, we'd be requiring people who want to port, test and release their ports on "flag day" to build from CVS to test. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Lustre-devel mailing list Lustre-devel@clusterfs.com https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-devel
