Thanks! I think I had a parameter problem when I formatted the mgs. I am re-doing that now.
-- Andrew > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeffrey Bennett [mailto:j...@sdsc.edu] > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 3:13 PM > To: Lundgren, Andrew; Lustre discuss > Subject: RE: [Lustre-discuss] client mount entry for fstab with > Active/Passive MGS/MDS > > Andrew, > > This is how I use it: > > # mount -t lustre mds-...@tcp0:mds-...@tcp0:/npfs /mnt/npfs > > So /etc/fstab would be something like: > > mds-...@tcp0:mds-...@tcp0:/npfs /mnt/npfs lustre ...whatever... > > > Note that mds-0-0 and mds-0-1 are also MGS, despite their name. > > > jab > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org [mailto:lustre- > discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org] On Behalf Of Lundgren, Andrew > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:36 PM > To: Lustre discuss > Subject: [Lustre-discuss] client mount entry for fstab with > Active/Passive MGS/MDS > > > > I have a single MDT/MGT that is hosted on a pair of MGS/MDS > machines acting as a failover pair. Both MDS/MGS machines have > visibility to the shared MDT/MGT. One of the two machines has the FS > mounted, the other does not. > > > > On my client side I have the following in my fstab: > > > > 10.248.58....@tcp0:10.248.58....@tcp0:/content /content > lustre defaults,_netdev 0 0 > > > > I have also tried separating the machines with a "," but it > hasn't made any run difference. There is a difference in > /var/log/messages, but either way, it doesn't work. > > > > Should I be using the , or the :? Is my syntax correct? > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- > > Andrew _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
