Well, my little trick isn't working right now. I'm not sure how to debug this.
Robert LeBlanc Life Sciences & Undergraduate Education Computer Support Brigham Young University On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Robert LeBlanc <rob...@leblancnet.us>wrote: > We are running 1.8.0.180 and seem to have an issue with ACLs that I hope > someone can help us with. We have ACLs enabled on Lustre and can write them > and read them just fine. However, Lustre does not seems to respect ACLs like > Linux should. An example: > > drwxrwx---+ 3 user1 root 4.0K 2009-10-26 14:29 zz > > # file: zz > # owner: yanzzee > # group: root > user::rwx > group::rwx > group:group1:rwx > mask::rwx > other::--- > > So user1 is the owner of directory zz and root is the group owner, but > group1 has full permissions on directory through ACLs. User2 is a member of > group1, but is not able to list or modify the directory. This same set-up > works in tmp and is what I am used to. In order for it to work on Lustre, I > have to set the Default ACL for the group before access is granted. If I > remove all the default ACLs, it still works. Is there something that I am > doing wrong that the behavior is not what I expect from other filesystems? > > Thanks, > > Robert LeBlanc > Life Sciences & Undergraduate Education Computer Support > Brigham Young University >
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
