Thanks for the clarification. I really think we should have a Wiki page that shows the critical problems and their patches instead of looking at bugzilla. That would be very helpful.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Peter Jones <peter.a.jo...@sun.com> wrote: > We have no present plans for a 1.6.7.3 release though it is quite possible > we will do one at some point. However, reviewing the first few of the bugs > listed below I think maybe some clarification about how the flags work would > alleviate your concerns in this area. A + flag is confirmation that the > event has taken place, so "landed 1.6.7.2+" means that the patch is actually > *in* the 1.6.7.2 release, not that it was landed *after* the 1.6.7.2 > release. > > Mag Gam wrote: >> >> Will there ever be a 1.6.7.3 release? It seems some bugs from 1.6.7.2 >> have been addressed. >> >> 17336 18289 19453 19514 19539 19584 19586 19601 19697 19728 19754 >> 19759 19788 20491 >> >> Is it best just to patch 1.6.7.2 or wait for 1.6.7.3? >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss