Hi Erik, Can you post your changes so that other members on the alias can use it as well?
Cheers, _Atul Erik Froese wrote: > I have it running on 1.8. 1.1. It works well. I had to edit the SQL it > generated though. > Erik > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Jim Garlick <garl...@llnl.gov > <mailto:garl...@llnl.gov>> wrote: > > I'm using LMT with 1.8 on our test system and it seems to be OK. > We're still 1.6.6 in production so it hasn't been extensively > tested with 1.8. > > Jim > > On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:23:54AM -0800, Cliff White wrote: > > Jeffrey Bennett wrote: > > > Last time I checked, LMT was designed for Lustre 1.4. LLNL > stopped development of LMT some time ago. Not sure if LMT will > work with Lustre 1.8. If somebody has tried, please let everyone know. > > > > > > > Ah, it has moved to Google: > > http://code.google.com/p/lmt/ > > > > "The current release has been tested with Lustre 1.6.6." > > So, yup, seems a bit old. But might be worth looking into. > > cliffw > > > > > jab > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org > <mailto:lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org> > [mailto:lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org > <mailto:lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org>] On Behalf Of > Cliff White > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 11:12 AM > > > To: Jagga Soorma > > > Cc: lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > <mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org> > > > Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre Monitoring Tools > > > > > > Jagga Soorma wrote: > > >> Hi Guys, > > >> > > >> I would like to monitor the performance and usage of my Lustre > > >> filesystem and was wondering what are the commonly used > monitoring tools > > >> for this? Cacti? Nagios? Any input would be greatly > appreciated. > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> -Simran > > >> > > > > > > LLNL's LMT tool is very good. It's available on Sourceforge, > afaik. > > > cliffw > > > > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Lustre-discuss mailing list > > >> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > <mailto:Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org> > > >> http://*lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > <http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Lustre-discuss mailing list > > > Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > <mailto:Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org> > > > http://*lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > <http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Lustre-discuss mailing list > > Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > <mailto:Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org> > > http://*lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > <http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss> > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > <mailto:Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org> > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss