Hi Bernd, Sorry if I insist on this issue or if my questions may seem simple, but just to clarify:
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 12:51 +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote: > > >> The binary SLES packages are fine; it is the source packages that may be > > >> problematic, depending on your config. There is a bug filed against this > > > > > > Sorry Guy. May be there is something I am missing, but SLES11 rpm kernel > > > server packages for lustre-1.8.3 are created using a config with > > > ONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES=y (See yourself on the attachement > > > > You are entirely correct. > > To be clear here, this is a CLIENT side issue. So whatever you do set on the > server side is irrelevant. Oracle cannot set kernel options for clients, as > those are upstream kernels and lustre is compiled patchless against it. > > Applying this Lustre patch from bugzilla#15587 should solve the issue > without > the need to recompile the kernel: > > https://bugzilla.lustre.org/attachment.cgi?id=29116 - Is this an issue that affects every client, both patchless clients and not patchless or only those clients with SLES11 servers.? - May I apply the above patch to build modules that will be used both and servers and clients? (I usually do: no patchless kernel for clients but the same as servers) Regards -- Ramiro Alba Centre Tecnològic de Tranferència de Calor http://www.cttc.upc.edu Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyeries Industrial i Aeronàutica de Terrassa Colom 11, E-08222, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain Tel: (+34) 93 739 86 46 -- Aquest missatge ha estat analitzat per MailScanner a la cerca de virus i d'altres continguts perillosos, i es considera que està net. _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss