On 09/17/10 10:24, Fan Yong wrote: > On 9/18/10 1:18 AM, Peter Jones wrote: >> The URL does not work for me, but if it is a statahead issue then >> surely turning statahead off would be a simple workaround to avoid >> having to apply a patch. > Strange, it is a public link. I can access it without login. > Anyway, after inspection, I will attach it to Lustre Bugzilla for > further review/verify.
FWIW - the link worked for me. Thanks. -jeff > Cheers, > Nasf >> Fan Yong wrote: >>> On 9/14/10 8:55 PM, Gabriele Paciucci wrote: >>>> I have the same problem, I put the statahead_max to 0 !!! >>> In fact, I have made a patch for statahead related issues (including >>> this one) against lustre-1.8, which is in inspection. >>> http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,2 >>> If possible, you can try such patch. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> -- >>> Nasf >>> > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss