Old version of e2fsprogs actually has bugs like this, the newer the better, I think
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Craig Prescott <presc...@hpc.ufl.edu> wrote: > Andreas Dilger wrote: >> Do you have enough RAM to run e2fsck on this node? Have you tried running >> it under gdb to see if it can catch the sig11 and print a stack trace? > > Yup, plenty of RAM - we've got 32GB in this node. > > We've already started up fsck again using Colin's suggestion of > e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2. So far so good. But if we need to fire it up > under gdb, I guess that's what we'll do. > > Thanks, > Craig Prescott > UF HPC Center > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
