I'm inclined to agree. So apparently the only time that modifying the runtime max values has a benefit is while the threads_started is low?
Joe ==== Joe Mervini Sandia National Laboratories High Performance Computing 505.844.6770 jame...@sandia.gov On Feb 24, 2011, at 1:09 PM, Kevin Van Maren wrote: > However, I don't think you can decrease the number of running threads. > See https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22417 (and also > https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22516 ) > > Kevin > > > Mervini, Joseph A wrote: >> Cool! Thank you Johann. >> ==== >> >> Joe Mervini >> Sandia National Laboratories >> High Performance Computing >> 505.844.6770 >> jame...@sandia.gov >> >> >> >> On Feb 24, 2011, at 11:05 AM, Johann Lombardi wrote: >> >> >>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:48:32AM -0700, Mervini, Joseph A wrote: >>> >>>> Quick question: Has runtime modification of the number of OST threads been >>>> implemented in Lustre-1.8.3? >>>> >>> Yes, see bugzilla ticket 18688. It was landed in 1.8.1. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Johann >>> >>> -- >>> Johann Lombardi >>> Whamcloud, Inc. >>> www.whamcloud.com >>> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >> > > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss