I guess the new Lustre release process is similar to how Ubuntu is released. While we do our best to make each release as stable as possible, there is a different expectation for long-term updates of the feature releases and the maintenance releases.
Cheers, Andreas On 2012-06-09, at 16:05, Wojciech Turek <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for a quick reply Andreas. I slightly misunderstood the lustre > release process and thought that the next stable/production version is > 2.2 > > I am then interested in the experience of people running Lustre 2.1 > > Cheers > > Wojciech > > On 9 June 2012 21:52, Andreas Dilger <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think you'll find that there are not yet (m)any production deployments of >> 2.2. There are a number of production 2.1 deployments, and this is the >> current maintenance stream from Whamcloud. >> >> Cheers, Andreas >> >> On 2012-06-09, at 14:33, Wojciech Turek <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I am building a 1.5PB storage system which will employ Lustre as the >>> main file system. The storage system will be extended at the later >>> stage beyond 2PB. I am considering using Lustre 2.2 for production >>> environment. This Lustre storage system will replace our older 300TB >>> system which is currently running Lustre 1.8.8. I am quite happy with >>> lustre 1.8.8 however for the new system Lustre 2.2 seem to be a better >>> match. The storage system will be attached to a university wide >>> cluster (800 nodes), hence there will be quite a large range of >>> applications using the filesystem. Could people with production >>> deployments of Lustre 2.2 share their experience please? >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Wojciech Turek >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Lustre-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
