On 13/11/12 21:26, Ned Bass wrote: > - A review process for proposed changes that assures a high standard of > quality
That's important. I've spotted cases where it's clear there's an issue, but am not sure what the correct answer is. A quick way of reporting issues in the manual would be useful too - whilst I did go to the effort of registering in order to submit typos, that's rather heavyweight. Just being able to send an e-mail would be easier - but it's true that someone needs to sort them. Chris _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss