Hi, Le 18/12/2012 19:27, Alexander Oltu a écrit : > This is one of OSSes: > [root@oss1 ~]# lctl list_nids > 192.168.110.21@tcp > 192.168.111.21@tcp1 > > This is one of the clients: > nid00030:~ # lctl list_nids > 192.168.110.101@tcp > 192.168.111.101@tcp1
Everything seems fine. > > Thank you for the clear explanation, I will try --network > option distributed over OSTs and will get back. BTW, do you know > if this setup has better performance than simply bonded NICs? I have no experience in doing multirail on ethernet, sorry. The principle is exactly the same as for Infiniband, but as Infiniband interfaces cannot be bonded (except for IPoIB which is not of interest when considering performance), I cannot tell. > > Does this mean that it is enough to mount like this? > mount.lustre 192.168.110.11@tcp0:/lustre /mnt/lustre Absolutely. Adding a second NID only serves for high-availability purpose when establishing the initial connection. Cheers, Sebastien. _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
