But.... if I configure the OST assigning to the first interface of the OSS (bond0) and as failover OSS the second inteface of the OSS. If the bond0 network down, the client will try to connect to the failover, that is the second interface of the OSS.
is it possible? From: Brian O'Connor Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 1:09 AM To: 'Alfonso Pardo' ; 'Michael Shuey' Cc: 'WC-Discuss' ; mailto:[email protected] Subject: RE: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces Unless something has changed in the new versions of lustre, I don't think lustre can do failover between nids on the same machine. It can choose the available nid at mount time, but if an active nid goes away after you are mounted then the client chooses the failover nid, and this must be on a different server. Check the archives for more discussion in this topic :) -----Original Message----- From: Alfonso Pardo [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 07:23 AM Central Standard Time To: Michael Shuey Cc: WC-Discuss; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces thank Michael, This is my second step, I will change the lnet with “options lnet networks=tcp0(bond0,bond1)” because my machines has 4 nics. I have a bond0 and bond1 with LACP. I need to comunicate the clients with two network for HA network. If the bond0 network is down, the clients can reach the OSS by the second network bond1. If I change the modprobe with “options lnet networks=tcp0(bond0),tcp1(bond1)”, how the clients mount the filesystem to reach the OSS by two network? From: Michael Shuey Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:14 PM To: Alfonso Pardo Cc: [email protected] ; WC-Discuss Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces Different interfaces need to be declared with different LNET networks - something like "networks=tcp0(eth0),tcp1(eth1)". Of course, that assumes your clients are configured to use a mix of tcp0 and tcp1 for connections (with each client only using one of the two). This is really only useful in corner cases, when you're doing something strange; if eth0 and eth1 are in the same subnet (as in your example), this is almost certainly not productive. A better bet might be to use a single LNET, and bond the two interfaces together - either as an active/passive pair, or active/active (e.g., LACP). Then you'd declare networks=tcp0(bond0), give the bond a single IP address, and client traffic would be split across the two members in the bond more like you probably expect (given the limits of the bond protocol you're using). -- Mike Shuey On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Alfonso Pardo <[email protected]> wrote: hello friends, I need to comunicate my OSS by two ethernet TCP interfaces: eth0 and eth1. I have configured this feature in my modprobe.d with: “options lnet networks=tcp0(eth0,eth1)” And I can see two interfaces with: lctl --net tcp interface_list sa-d4-01.ceta-ciemat.es: (192.168.11.15/255.255.255.0) npeer 0 nroute 2 sa-d4-01.ceta-ciemat.es: (192.168.11.35/255.255.255.0) npeer 0 nroute 0 But, the clients only can communicate with the first interface: lctl ping 192.168.11.15 12345-0@lo 12345-192.168.11.15@tcp lctl ping 192.168.11.35 failed to ping 192.168.11.35@tcp: Input/output error Any suggestions how to “enable” the second interface? thank in advance Alfonso Pardo Diaz System Administrator / Researcher c/ Sola nº 1; 10200 TRUJILLO, SPAIN Tel: +34 927 65 93 17 Fax: +34 927 32 32 37 ---------------------------- Confidencialidad: Este mensaje y sus ficheros adjuntos se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si no es vd. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización está prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente respondiendo al mensaje y proceda a su destrucción. Disclaimer: This message and its attached files is intended exclusively for its recipients and may contain confidential information. If you received this e-mail in error you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. In this case, please notify us by a reply and delete this email and its contents immediately. ---------------------------- _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
