Hi Andreas, Myricom contacted me and said that they are not supporting it any longer. Feel free to delete it.
Scott On Feb 24, 2014, at 1:05 PM, Scott Atchley <atchle...@ornl.gov> wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > I do not know if anyone is still using mxlnd or not. > > I do not know if anyone at Myricom will provide support for it. Also, I am > not sure if the MX kernel API is still fully maintained. I have CC'd > h...@mryi.com in case they wish to comment. > > Scott > > On Feb 20, 2014, at 1:39 PM, "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dil...@intel.com> > wrote: > >> Forwarding this to lustre-discuss and the mxlnd author to reach the >> maximum audience. >> >> I definitely think qswlnd is beyond its useful lifetime (Quadrics is out >> of business since 2009, so any systems using it are at least 5 years old), >> and I believe ralnd is the same boat (it was only used for much older Cray >> systems). No idea if anyone is still using mxlnd? >> >> On 2014/02/20, 9:08 AM, "Simmons, James A." <simmon...@ornl.gov> wrote: >>> Currently the main LND drivers in the tree are o2iblnd, gnilnd, and >>> socklnd. We also have a few drivers which are up for discussion for >>> removal. >>> The drivers up for discussion for removal are: >>> >>> qswlnd >>> mxlnd >>> ralnd >>> >>> If anyone is using these drivers speak up otherwise their removal will be >>> put into the pipeline. >> >> >> Cheers, Andreas >> -- >> Andreas Dilger >> >> Lustre Software Architect >> Intel High Performance Data Division >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
