Yep. That is it! I'll make accommodations. Thanks!

Brian Andrus
ITACS/Research Computing
Naval Postgraduate School
Monterey, California
voice: 831-656-6238



From: Ben Evans [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 1:34 PM
To: Andrus, Brian Contractor <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] 2.9.51 missing health check?

check to see if it moved to /sys/fs/lustre/health_check

-Ben Evans

From: lustre-discuss 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 on behalf of "Andrus, Brian Contractor" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, January 20, 2017 at 4:05 PM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [lustre-discuss] 2.9.51 missing health check?

All,
I recently built lustre from the  2.9.51_34_g835335a source and installed the 
resulting rpms on a box.
Now my Nagios checks no longer work because /proc/fs/lustre/health_check does 
not exist.

Is there a change in the build process that disables this? Any updated health 
check script or work-around?

Thanks in advance,

Brian Andrus
ITACS/Research Computing
Naval Postgraduate School
Monterey, California
voice: 831-656-6238

_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

Reply via email to