On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:23:13 -0700 Brian Andrus <[email protected]> wrote:
> That choice is mainly between the need for direct support or not. +1 > CentOS is considered the exact same as RHEL except for the branding. > However, there is no commercially available support for it. > > I would say, in a nutshell, if you have someone who is knowledgeable > about building kernel modules, go with CentOS. > If your system is mission critical or will be, go with RHEL I agree but would add that if support is found to be of interest then one may want to consider it in a wider context. As in lustre support and/or os support? What do you want from the os support? Include EUS or similar? /Peter K > Brian Andrus .. > On 10/18/2017 2:59 AM, Amjad Syed wrote: > > Hello > > We are in process of purchasing a new lustre filesystem for our > > site that will be used for life sciences and genomics. > > We would like to know if we should buy rhel license or go wit > > centos. We will be storing and using dna samples for analysis here. _______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
