> On Oct 30, 2017, at 4:46 PM, Brian Andrus <toomuc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but that seems a bit large of an 
> MDT. Of course drives these days are pretty good sized, so the extra is 
> probably very inexpensive.

That probably depends on what the primary usage will be.  If the applications 
create lots of small files (like some biomed programs), then a larger MDT would 
result in more inodes allowing more Lustre files to be created.

--
Rick Mohr
Senior HPC System Administrator
National Institute for Computational Sciences
http://www.nics.tennessee.edu

_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

Reply via email to