Thanks for the link! I'll spin up a test system with 2.12.0 and see what breaks. -Nate
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 12:20 PM Peter Jones <pjo...@whamcloud.com> wrote: > Nathan > > > > Yes 2.12 is an LTS branch. We’re planning on putting out both 2.10.7 and > 2.12.1 this quarter but have been focusing on the former first to allow for > more time to receive feedback from early adopters on 2.12.0. You can see > the patches that will land starting to accumulate here - > https://review.whamcloud.com/#/q/status:open+project:fs/lustre-release+branch:b2_12 > . I guess what I am trying to say is “be patient” ☺ > > > > Peter > > > > *From: *Nathan R Crawford <nrcra...@uci.edu> > *Reply-To: *"nathan.crawf...@uci.edu" <nathan.crawf...@uci.edu> > *Date: *Friday, February 22, 2019 at 11:31 AM > *To: *Peter Jones <pjo...@whamcloud.com> > *Cc: *"lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org" <lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org> > *Subject: *Re: [lustre-discuss] Which release to use? > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > Somewhat related: where should we be looking for the commits leading up > to 2.12.1? The b2_12 branch ( > https://git.whamcloud.com/?p=fs/lustre-release.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/b2_12) > has no activity since 2.12.0 was released. I assumed that if 2.12 is a LTS > branch like 2.10, there would be something by now. Commits started > appearing on b2_10 after a week or so. > > > > "Be patient" is an acceptable response :) > > > > -Nate > > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:51 AM Peter Jones <pjo...@whamcloud.com> wrote: > > 2.12.0 is relatively new. It does have some improvements over 2.10.x > (notably Data on MDT) but if those are not an immediate requirement then > using 2.10.6 would be a proven and more comnservative option. 2.12.51 is an > interim development build for 2.13 and should absolutely not be used for > production purposes. > > On 2019-02-22, 10:07 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Bernd Melchers" < > lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org on behalf of > melch...@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > > Hi all, > in the git repository i find v2.10.6, v2.12.0 and v2.12.51. Which > version should > i compile and use for my productive CentOS 7.6 System? > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen > Bernd Melchers > > -- > Archiv- und Backup-Service | fab-serv...@zedat.fu-berlin.de > Freie Universität Berlin | Tel. +49-30-838-55905 > _______________________________________________ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > > > _______________________________________________ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > > > > > -- > > Dr. Nathan Crawford nathan.crawf...@uci.edu > > Modeling Facility Director > > Department of Chemistry > > 1102 Natural Sciences II Office: 2101 Natural Sciences II > > University of California, Irvine Phone: 949-824-4508 > > Irvine, CA 92697-2025, USA > > -- Dr. Nathan Crawford nathan.crawf...@uci.edu Modeling Facility Director Department of Chemistry 1102 Natural Sciences II Office: 2101 Natural Sciences II University of California, Irvine Phone: 949-824-4508 Irvine, CA 92697-2025, USA
_______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org