Hi Steve,

I was having a similar problem in the past months where the MDS servers would 
go OOM because of SlabUnreclaim. The root cause has not yet been found but we 
stopped seeing this the day we disabled the NRS TBF (QoS) for any LDLM service 
(just in case you have it enabled). Just in case you have it enabled. It would 
be good to check as well what’s being consumed in the slab cache. In our case 
it was mostly kernel objects and not ldlm.

Diego


From: lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org> on behalf of 
Steve Crusan <ste...@dug.com>
Date: Thursday, 2 January 2020 at 20:25
To: "lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org" <lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: [lustre-discuss] LDLM locks not expiring/cancelling

Hi all,

We are running into a bizarre situation where we aren't having stale locks 
cancel themselves, and even worse, it seems as if ldlm.namespaces.*.lru_size is 
being ignored.

For instance, I unmount our Lustre file systems on a client machine, then 
remount. Next, I'll run "lctl set_param ldlm.namespaces.*.lru_max_age=60s, lctl 
set_param ldlm.namespaces.*.lru_size=1024". This (I believe) theoretically 
would only allow 1024 ldlm locks per osc, and then I'd see a lot of lock 
cancels (via ldlm.namespaces.${ost}.pool.stats). We also should see cancels if 
the grant time > lru_max_age.

We can trigger this simply by running 'find' on the root of our Lustre file 
system, and waiting for awhile. Eventually the clients SUnreclaim value bloats 
to 60-70GB (!!!), and each of our OSTs have 30-40k LRU locks (via lock_count). 
This is early in the process:

"""
ldlm.namespaces.h5-OST003f-osc-ffff8802d8559000.lock_count=2090
ldlm.namespaces.h5-OST0040-osc-ffff8802d8559000.lock_count=2127
ldlm.namespaces.h5-OST0047-osc-ffff8802d8559000.lock_count=52
ldlm.namespaces.h5-OST0048-osc-ffff8802d8559000.lock_count=1962
ldlm.namespaces.h5-OST0049-osc-ffff8802d8559000.lock_count=1247
ldlm.namespaces.h5-OST004a-osc-ffff8802d8559000.lock_count=1642
ldlm.namespaces.h5-OST004b-osc-ffff8802d8559000.lock_count=1340
ldlm.namespaces.h5-OST004c-osc-ffff8802d8559000.lock_count=1208
ldlm.namespaces.h5-OST004d-osc-ffff8802d8559000.lock_count=1422
ldlm.namespaces.h5-OST004e-osc-ffff8802d8559000.lock_count=1244
ldlm.namespaces.h5-OST004f-osc-ffff8802d8559000.lock_count=1117
ldlm.namespaces.h5-OST0050-osc-ffff8802d8559000.lock_count=1165
"""

But this will grow over time, and eventually this compute node gets evicted 
from the MDS (after 10 minutes of cancelling locks/hanging). The only way we 
have been able to reduce the slab usage is to drop caches and set 
LRU=clear...but the problem just comes back depending on the workload.

We are running 2.10.3 client side, 2.10.1 server side. Have there been any 
fixes added into the codebase for 2.10 that we need to apply? This seems to be 
the closest to what we are experiencing:

https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-11518


PS: I've checked other systems across our cluster, and some of them have as 
many as 50k locks per OST. I am kind of wondering if these locks are staying 
around much longer than the lru_max_age default (65 minutes), but I cannot 
prove that. Is there a good way to translate held locks to fids? I have been 
messing around with lctl set_param debug="XXX" and lctl set_param 
ldlm.namespaces.*.dump_namespace, but I don't feel like I'm getting *all* of 
the locks.

~Steve
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

Reply via email to