Peter, I have been trying to get 2.14 ready with ZFS 2.0.4 on CentOS 7.9 but I have encountered a couple of issues. This is what I have been doing:
ZFS: Install dependency packages git clone https://github.com/openzfs/zfs.git git checkout remotes/origin/zfs-2.0-release ./autogen.sh ./configure make && make rpms install libzfs4, zfs-2.0.4, zfs-dksm (have tried also installing kmod-zfs*, libuutil3, libnvpair3, libzpool4) Lustre: git clone git://git.whamcloud.com/fs/lustre-release.git git checkout remotes/origin/b2_14 ./autogen.sh ./configure --enable-ldiskfs --with-zfs --enable-quota --enable-utils --enable-gss --enable-snmp --with-zfs-obj=/var/lib/dkms/zfs/2.0.4/3.10.0- 1160.24.1.el7.x86_64/x86_64 make <<< here I have linking breaks I get an error like this: fatal error: sys/byteorder.h: No such file or directory #include <sys/byteorder.h> I wondering if I'm doing this on an updated CentOS 7.9 host running kernel 3.10.0-1160.24.1.el7 instead of the one used for testing during release cycle: 3.10.0-1160.6.1.el7. is there something I'm missing or doing wrong in this case? Should I be able to compile then build RPMs i.e. using now available 3.10.0-1160.25.1.el7 so we can have happy security folks by using the latest kernel? Please advise. Thanks in advance! -- *Hugo R Hernandez* "Se seus esforços foram vistos com indeferença, não desanime que o sol faze um espectacolo maravilhoso todas as manhãs enquanto a maioria das pessoas ainda estão dormindo" - Anónimo brasileiro On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 12:01 PM Peter Jones <pjo...@whamcloud.com> wrote: > Hugo > > > > 2.14 will likely build/work against centos 7.9 even though that was not > the primary kernel it was tested against > > > > Peter > > > > *From: *lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org> on > behalf of Hugo R Hernandez via lustre-discuss < > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org> > *Reply-To: *Hugo R Hernandez <hdezm...@gmail.com> > *Date: *Thursday, April 15, 2021 at 8:50 AM > *To: *"lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org" <lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org> > *Subject: *[lustre-discuss] Lustre version 2.14 support for CentOS 7 > > > > Hello there! We have been planning to upgrade Lustre from 2.10+ to 2.14, > but we encountered it supports only RHEL 8.3, SLES 15 SP2, and Ubuntu > 20.04. How about RHEL/CentOS 7? > > > > https://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/lustre/lustre-2.14.0/ > > > > We can see release 2.13 supports RHEL 7.7 (servers and clients) and 2.12.9 > supports RHEL 7.9. Part of this upgrade is motivated to work on a > OST-to-DoM migration but this appears to be possible until 2.13. Our > desire is to use DoM to alleviate with metadata performance due to tons of > small files. We want at this point to verify if any 2.13 or 2.14 would > eventually support CentOS 7.9. > > > > Thanks in advance! > > -Hugo > > > -- > > "Se seus esforços foram vistos com indeferença, não desanime que o sol > faze um espectacolo maravilhoso todas as manhãs enquanto a maioria das > pessoas ainda estão dormindo" > > - Anónimo brasileiro >
_______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org