>>> On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 06:13:52 +0000, Andreas Dilger via >>> lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org> said:
> I've recently realized that "lfs find -size N" defaults to > looking for files of N *bytes* by default, unlike regular > find(1) that is assuming 512-byte blocks by default if no > units are given. [...] I think that compatibility with 'find' matters a lot, so I support the proposed changes. Also note that 'find' has a bizarre rule about rounding up to a whole multiple of the given unit, which 'lfs find' regrettably ought to do too if it does not already. http://www.sabi.co.uk/blog/23-one.html?230117#230117 BTW I was about to report a problem specific to 'lfs find': --mirror-state ro -a --mirror-state wp -a --mirror-state sp only tests "sp", the two previous tests for "ro" and "wp" have no effect. This has caused me problems because I was trying to run 'lfs resync' only on files that are "^ro" and also "^sp" and not "^wp", and this seems impossible in a single 'lfs find'. It looks to me as if '--mirror-state' behaves as an *option* ('find' has "options", "positional options" and "global options") and not as a *test*. At the very least this should be prominently documented. This might be hinted by having "xx" and "^xx" forms, which suggests that these two are not equivalent: ! --mirror state ro --mirror-state ^ro which would make sense if "--mirror-state" is an option. _______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org