Hello everyone.

I am observing unexpected behavior regarding file striping in a directory that has an explicitly configured layout. I'm launching an application that writes *new *files on a given directory, which is empty and I previously set its layout using |lfs setstripe| with a fixed stripe count, stripe size, and a specific set of OSTs (command lfs setstripe -S 4M -c 3 -o 1,2,3 target_directory). Running simple tools such as |dd| inside that directory produces files with the correct stripe pattern, checked using lfs getstripe.

However, when my application creates new files in that same directory, *all* of those files end up with a different layout: some are created with a stripe count of 1 and almost always put in the OST with index 1, others are placed n OSTs that are not part of the directory’s configured offset/OST set (for example, striped across OSTs 0, 1 and 2). This happens even though the files did not exist beforehand and the directory was empty with the correct striping applied. The application creates files with standard POSIX I/O (|open()| followed by appends and writes), nothing exotic or MPI-IO-related.

Given that the directory layout is correct and tools like |dd| follow it reliably, I am trying to understand under what circumstances Lustre would ignore the directory’s default layout when creating new regular files. I would appreciate any insight or guidance on what might explain this behaviour, and how could I fix it.

I'm using Lustre 2.15.7, with RHEL 9.6 for the clients and RHEL 8.10 for the OSSs/MDS/MGS.

Thank you very much in advance.

Best regards,
Santiago

_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
  • [... Santiago Freire - InCo via lustre-discuss
    • ... Andreas Dilger via lustre-discuss
      • ... Santiago Freire - InCo via lustre-discuss
        • ... Andreas Dilger via lustre-discuss
          • ... Vicker, Darby J. (JSC-EG311)[AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC] via lustre-discuss
            • ... Mohr, Rick via lustre-discuss
              • ... Santiago Freire - InCo via lustre-discuss
                • ... Andreas Dilger via lustre-discuss
        • ... Mohr, Rick via lustre-discuss

Reply via email to