CCs to the sender are an artifact of the absurd policy of making the return address the individual rather than the list. This should be fixed, but apparently the influential members of this list enjoy this chaos.
Stewart McCoy wrote: > Let's try again. Wayne's robot intercepted my last message. > > Dear All, > > There is no need to send a duplicate copy of a message to an > individual who s*bscr*bes to the list. If he s*bscr*bes, he will > receive the message as a s*bscr*ber. If he gets his own c.c. copy as > well, he will receive the same message twice, which is unnecessary. > > Stewart McCoy. > > > > -- Rough-edged songs from a dark place in the soul: http://DoctorOakroot.com
