> As you take refuge, once again, to offensive language for lack of
> pausible arguments I quit discussion with you and your nonsense. Ask
> accomplished Arabists about your 'ain - ghain rubbish. Get a life,
> buddy.
As Americans say-
No pain, no ghain.
But it is interesting to see "lutes as foreign imports, in China", ain't it?
RT

______________
Roman M. Turovsky
http://polyhymnion.org/swv




> 
> "danyel" <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> Leather is tanned and elastic and thus unsuitable for use as a membrane.
>> The *rwd* theory is not my pet but borrowed from E. Neubauer who is well
>> versed in Middle Persian (we are not talking Farsi here) and historic
>> Arabic; there are plenty of examples of the 'ain sound being hardly
>> distinguishable from the ghain in Arabic dialects and it seems that the
>> Middle Persian could have had an indifference towards the articulation of
>> the "r", as in German, where the rolled "r" was replaced by the French
>> laryngal. The word rwd is used in the sense of string even in Farsi, cf.
>> Tarab-rwd. Anyhow, I am not myself qualified to discuss linguistics, just as
>> you are not qualified to discuss organology: you cannot even tell apart a
>> lute from a skin-covered gourd with a stick up its ****...
> 
> snip...  
> -- 
> Regards
> 
> Mathias
> 
> --
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


Reply via email to