A uniform weight distribution could be achieved by a new design that
would have half of the tuners at one end and half at the other like
we have seen on some practice guitars and some unusual
instruments, the Stossel lute being one of them (not sure of
spelling the name).
Cheers,
Marion
-----Original Message-----
From: gary digman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Apr 5, 2005 3:58 AM
To: lutelist <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Subject: Re: Newbie Question #2
We could have some form of "French" tuning pegs such as exist on my 5 string
double bass. They combine a gear with a wooden peg under slight friction. I
like them so much on my bass that I've often wished I had them on my lutes,
baroque guitar and gamba also. Maybe we can get the ear of a luthier on
this.
Gary
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dr. Marion Ceruti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Vance Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "lute list" <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>;
"Caroline Usher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: Newbie Question #2
> Vance Wood wrote:
>
> "However there is an historical accuracy not touched on and that is the
> limits of
> expediency in addressing some of the same problems that seem to plague
> us."
>
> ++I agree with Vance on this one.
> Whether we like it or not, we are stuck with historical accuracy.
> This past weekend I brought my 8c ren lute from the coast where
> it is cool and (relatively) damp to the desert where it is hot and dry.
> It took me an hour to tune, pegs being the way they are. If we
> were more interested in efficiency than were were in historical
> accuracy we would be using machine tuning. I can tune three
> or four strings on a modern instrument to within 1/4 cent accuracy
> (the limit of the gauge) in the time it takes to tune one string
> on a peg given a change in ambient temperature or humidity.
>
> I can see some advantage in movable frets, but I really see no
> advantage whatsoever in pegs, other than the historical significance.
> Historical accuracy comes with a very high pricetag in terms of
> time wasted that otherwise could be used for practicing.
>
> Best regards,
> Marion
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vance Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Apr 4, 2005 12:22 PM
> To: lute list <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>, Caroline Usher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Newbie Question #2
>
> Dear Caroline:
>
> In the context this was written------Yes. When it comes to understanding
> the instrument, the music and the player/authors------No. In answered to
> the question we? If that means you wish to exclude yourself from that
> painting with a broad brush I would like to hear your thoughts. If you
> mean
> that I am caught up in historical accuracy, which incidentally is not so
> because I cannot afford it, and should have not used the word "We" I
> stand
> corrected. However from the way things tend to go on this list it would
> seem that most are very much centered on historical accuracy. However
> there
> is an historical accuracy not touched on and that is the limits of
> expediency in addressing some of the same problems that seem to plague us.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Caroline Usher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "lute list" <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 12:04 PM
> Subject: Re: Newbie Question #2
>
>
>> At 11:29 AM 4/3/2005, Vance Wood wrote:
>> >I think sometimes we get too caught up in the historical accuracy of
>> >what
> it
>> >is we do.
>>
>> What you mean we, white man?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ;-)
>> Caroline
>> Caroline Usher
>> DCMB Administrative Coordinator
>> 613-8155, Box 91000
>> B343 LSRC
>>
>>
>>
>> To get on or off this list see list information at
>> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
