sorry all,
I suppose, I should now provide the link.

http://www.cumpiano.com/Home/Scrapbook/Archlute/archlseq1.htm




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chadwick Neal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lute net" <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 7:02 AM
Subject: Re: Schelle lute


> Dear Eugene and all,
>
>     I have been doing some research and came across this website that may
> need policing. I think it may be releveant to the topic at hand. How much
is
> too much?
> here is a guitar maker that effectively took a nice lute and applied
guitar
> priciples to it. i am more of a baroque person i.e. not sure of archlutes
as
> much. The bracing he used is incorrect, I believe. He thought that the
> relief scoop, in the soundboard to rib relationship, was a distortion of
> some sort. And, not only that he claims that he received information from
> the lute society! the more informed of you might police this guy, for i
> don't think he should claim he did research and mislead others.
>
>
> Chad
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Eugene C. Braig IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lute net"
> <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 5:11 PM
> Subject: Re: Schelle lute
>
>
> > At 04:43 PM 4/20/2005, Roman Turovsky wrote:
> > > > I'm sorry, but the best examples I can call to mind
> > > > are the "baroque" mandolini of Dan Larson and the barockmandolinen
of
> > > > various current German luthiers (Dietrich, e.g.): nice lute-related
> > > > instruments with nice sound, but of dimensions/proportions unlike
> anything
> > > > of the baroque to rococo era, in spite of baroque inspired decor and
> gut
> > > > strings/frets.  I'm certain there are proper-lute parallels, even if
> not so
> > > > obvious.
> > >Anlike anything baroque/rococo???  How so?
> >
> >
> > These are rather idealized instruments, much bigger than extant
mandolini,
> > and designed for a smoothness of tone to appeal to modern ears.  As Eric
> > correctly points out, Dan Larson's standard mandolini (not his Strad
> > models) are maybe a little closer to some hypothetical original
(certainly
> > not Lambert's), but are still idealized in changing the volume of the
> > soundbox to something not quite like anything with precedent.  ...But
> there
> > must be some proper-lute parallels.  I'm keen for opinion on them.
> >
> >
> > >...but going all the way is
> > >a lot better than half-measure, especially if there is a definite
> > >opportunity, ifyouacquiremydrift.
> >
> >
> > I do...and I do.
> >
> > Eugene
> >
> >
> >
> > To get on or off this list see list information at
> > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> >
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Eugene C. Braig IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lute net"
> <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 5:11 PM
> Subject: Re: Schelle lute
>
>
> > At 04:43 PM 4/20/2005, Roman Turovsky wrote:
> > > > I'm sorry, but the best examples I can call to mind
> > > > are the "baroque" mandolini of Dan Larson and the barockmandolinen
of
> > > > various current German luthiers (Dietrich, e.g.): nice lute-related
> > > > instruments with nice sound, but of dimensions/proportions unlike
> anything
> > > > of the baroque to rococo era, in spite of baroque inspired decor and
> gut
> > > > strings/frets.  I'm certain there are proper-lute parallels, even if
> not so
> > > > obvious.
> > >Anlike anything baroque/rococo???  How so?
> >
> >
> > These are rather idealized instruments, much bigger than extant
mandolini,
> > and designed for a smoothness of tone to appeal to modern ears.  As Eric
> > correctly points out, Dan Larson's standard mandolini (not his Strad
> > models) are maybe a little closer to some hypothetical original
(certainly
> > not Lambert's), but are still idealized in changing the volume of the
> > soundbox to something not quite like anything with precedent.  ...But
> there
> > must be some proper-lute parallels.  I'm keen for opinion on them.
> >
> >
> > >...but going all the way is
> > >a lot better than half-measure, especially if there is a definite
> > >opportunity, ifyouacquiremydrift.
> >
> >
> > I do...and I do.
> >
> > Eugene
> >
> >
> >
> > To get on or off this list see list information at
> > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> >
>
>
>



Reply via email to