Jon,
  Another thing to bear in mind is that a string, when pressed against the
fret, never makes a perfectly straight plane.  I mean that when your finger
presses the string down in back of the fret, it produces a slight arch, not
a straight line.
Michael Thames
www.ThamesClassicalGuitars.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 12:56 AM
Subject: Re: Built-in action?


> OK guys,
>
> I'm thoroughly confused. Someone said that the "action" is the height of
the
> string above the fret, others have other definitions. To me the action is
a
> subjective thing - the pressure needed on the string to make a clean
sound.
> That can vary on the same instrument with different players depending on
> finger placement - close to the fret or in the middle. And on the distance
> between the frets. (That may not be so clear on a lute, but on an
> Appalachian dulcimer which is diatonic - so the low frets are very far
> apart - it is clear. When one fingers a string one is making a small
> triangle between the fret and the fret below, a bit of local string
stretch
> involved, and it is easier to fully depress at the midpoint between frets,
> although not musically advisable).
>
> So my point is that action is a complicated interaction of string height,
> string tension, and fret separation. And that is complicated by the large
> "triangle" between the bridge and the nut, the middle of the string is
> relatively "softer" than the nut or bridge ends - yet it has the greatest
> range of vibration when played open, so has to have the greatest spacing
> above the frets to avoid buzz (these latter have contradictory effects, so
> the string should be higher above the fret at mid range - except that the
> frets are closer spaced there, so they have a stiffer action due to the
> "fret spacing effect".)
>
> Wow, what a lot of stuff to think of. Maybe we should have a
multi-contured
> neck? I don't think I'll try that. I'm over my head. This is a physics of
> counter effects, and all must be considered. I think I'll let it stay
> subjective and experimental.
>
> Best, Jon
>
>
>
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>



Reply via email to