Could this have anything to do with it?

>From Alexander Batov's webpage:

"According to the research carried out by Robert Lundberg on historical lute
construction, a typical six-course lute of the late 16th century would have
had its neck about one and a half Venetian inches wide at the nut
(equivalent to c. 41 - 42mm). This corresponds rather well with a number of
the earliest surviving Renaissance lutes and results in positioning the
outer strings of the first and sixth courses on the nut at 36 - 38 mm
apart."

G.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 6:46 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: A different 6 course question


>
> In a message dated 2/20/2006 11:15:03 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> I've  been away all weekend and have just caught up on the six course
> discussion. Since we're on this topic I'd like to ask if anyone
> prefers a six course with a wider neck. I have one of Dan Larson's
> Ricercare six course lutes. It's a lovely instrument with good sound
> and response. However I find that I often am hitting the strings in
> the next course lower course when playing. I have thought it was
> because the neck very narrow nearer the pegbox and of course I've
> also  thought it might simply be my playing technique. But I got to
> comparing it  to my guitars and wondering if perhaps the neck couldn't
> be made a tad  wider, say half an inch, to alleviate this problem.
> Then I began to wonder  if others ran across this problem and what you
> did about it. So then, have  any of you players wanted a wider necked
> six course lute? Have any of your  luthiers made a wider necked six
> course lute? How did it work out? Did it  accomplish what you (and I)
> hoped it would?
>
>
> --------------------
>
> I have always found the narrower neck by the pegbox end to be an advantage
> when playing six course repertoire.  Often very difficult and complex
> fingerings have to be managed, such as some of the fantasias of Bakfark,
> and I  find
> it much easier on the six course lute because of both its narrower left
> hand
> spacing and also the rounded "half circle" cross section shape of the
> neck.  I
> play with my thumb coming to a rest on the upper side of the neck
> reverse.
>
> Of course, one can always determine the spacing on the left hand when the
> lute is being made or, if possible, by changing the groove spacings on the
> nut.
>
> Kenneth



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to