Hi Rainer, Your ex. 1 makes much more musical sense. For ex. 2, I do prefer the original (see echo in bar 23).
B.R. G. ----- Original Message ----- From: "adS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Lute net" <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 11:58 PM Subject: [LUTE] Milan, Fanatrsia 8 > Dear lute netters, > > I am currently studying Milan's Fantasia 8 and I think I should change two > bars, > however, I would like to know other people's opinions: > > I am tempted to change bar 14 > > from > _______ > _0_____ > _0_____ > ____2__ > _2_____ > _______ > > to > > _______ > _0_____ > _______ > _0__2__ > _2_____ > _______ > > Compare bar 17. > > and - less convincing though(?) - bar 21 > > from > > ________ > _3______ > _0____1_ > _0__2___ > ________ > ________ > > > to > > ________ > _3______ > _0__1___ > _0____2_ > ________ > ________ > > > Apparently somebody else wanted to change this bar as indicated by an > unknown > modern hand in the copy kept in Madrid, Biblioteca Nacional, R. 9281 :) > > Rainer adS > > > > To get on or off this list see list information at > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html >
